Wouldn’t it just be easier to let us include a tag if a post made significant use of LLMs throughout, rather than using a content block that could have interaction effects with other elements of the page. Even if it’s just one up the top, it breaks the aesthetics compared to a tag.
“If you “borrow language” from the LLM, that no longer counts as “text written by a human”.)”
This feels completely unworkable. Basically, it catches situations where you have a conversation with an LLM, then write the whole post manually. If the situation is that if you may want to write a Less Wrong post on a topic in the future, you’d have to avoid talking to an LLM about it, lest the LLM happen to suggest the best available term with no easy alternative. Actually, it’s worse than this. Unless you stop talking to LLMs completely LLM suggested terms will almost certainly become part of your ontology and it’d be impractical to mark them every time you use them.
By “borrow language” we mean here things like “whole phrases” not “specific terms” or “useful ontologies”. Think of the obnoxious headings ChatGPT and Claude love to use in their writetups. If you copy a whole phrase like that, it would count as LLM content. Please talk to LLMs a bunch when writing things.
Wouldn’t it just be easier to let us include a tag if a post made significant use of LLMs throughout, rather than using a content block that could have interaction effects with other elements of the page. Even if it’s just one up the top, it breaks the aesthetics compared to a tag.
“If you “borrow language” from the LLM, that no longer counts as “text written by a human”.)”
This feels completely unworkable. Basically, it catches situations where you have a conversation with an LLM, then write the whole post manually. If the situation is that if you may want to write a Less Wrong post on a topic in the future, you’d have to avoid talking to an LLM about it, lest the LLM happen to suggest the best available term with no easy alternative. Actually, it’s worse than this. Unless you stop talking to LLMs completely LLM suggested terms will almost certainly become part of your ontology and it’d be impractical to mark them every time you use them.
By “borrow language” we mean here things like “whole phrases” not “specific terms” or “useful ontologies”. Think of the obnoxious headings ChatGPT and Claude love to use in their writetups. If you copy a whole phrase like that, it would count as LLM content. Please talk to LLMs a bunch when writing things.