Everyone seems to forget something like Discovery or Networking infrastructure which connects parties who might have relevant win-wins available at all (whether through shared interest in need of coordination, or (partial) antagonism that could be reduced by compromise). It might simply make them aware of each other, or it might go further in helping form a group/coalition identity. You might be implicitly rolling this in, but anyway, I think it’s worth it’s own callout!
Agree Discovery or Networking infrastructure is needed!
In my ontology I’d not put it into Bargaining Infra but probably Information Infra, as in Coase’s classical work this would typically be identified as information cost. But ultimately that doesn’t super matter. In this piece I’m mostly trying to lay out the big picture story, but I agree there’s a corresponding piece of work here (which I’m actively thinking about) which is basically mapping out the R&D programme to unlock this path, which would go into much m ore detail on the tech.
Yes, that makes a lot of sense. So glad to hear you’re doing more roadmapping here! FLF also on this (as, I think, you know). We should compare notes at some stage.
Everyone seems to forget something like Discovery or Networking infrastructure which connects parties who might have relevant win-wins available at all (whether through shared interest in need of coordination, or (partial) antagonism that could be reduced by compromise). It might simply make them aware of each other, or it might go further in helping form a group/coalition identity. You might be implicitly rolling this in, but anyway, I think it’s worth it’s own callout!
Agree Discovery or Networking infrastructure is needed!
In my ontology I’d not put it into Bargaining Infra but probably Information Infra, as in Coase’s classical work this would typically be identified as information cost. But ultimately that doesn’t super matter. In this piece I’m mostly trying to lay out the big picture story, but I agree there’s a corresponding piece of work here (which I’m actively thinking about) which is basically mapping out the R&D programme to unlock this path, which would go into much m ore detail on the tech.
Yes, that makes a lot of sense. So glad to hear you’re doing more roadmapping here! FLF also on this (as, I think, you know). We should compare notes at some stage.