I appreciate the idea but I don’t know much about Substack. Why do you think Substack would get a lot of engagement? I’m also open to other ideas of this sort.
Substack is designed for news, not for posts people will be reading in five years. Reading a Substack’s archive is a pain, and most Substacks are poorly indexed by Google. Therefore, if you take the intermittent-posting approach, I recommend posting to both a Substack and a separate stand-alone website (for inspiration, considerAndy Masley ordynomight’s pages). Your Substack allows people who are interested in your thoughts to subscribe and be automatically notified when you have something new to say, while the stand-alone website serves as a canonical reference.
I appreciate the idea but I don’t know much about Substack. Why do you think Substack would get a lot of engagement? I’m also open to other ideas of this sort.
(x)
Largely due to network effects; a lot of bloggers I follow (including many rationalists) are there, and there are some discoverability features.