@Karl Krueger, thank you for the typo corrections and reacts! I deleted the “linked landlines” part since it was confusing and added nothing, but, for reference, I was referring to a practice of address-based sampling (ABS) where addresses are sometimes matched out to landlines to make it easier to contact them for responses. These often leads to particular sampling bias (which can sometimes be addressed by creating separate sets of addresses that can be matched and those that cannot). It is sort of a middle ground between randomly sampling addresses and landline surveys (randomly sampling numbers has a lot of issues).
Since surveys using landlines are generally more prone to bogus responses, I had referenced that in my example, but on reflection is a needless nuance that doesn’t change the point being made.
I will probably try to reword a few things pursuant to some other areas you marked tomorrow, time permitting.
@Karl Krueger, thank you for the typo corrections and reacts! I deleted the “linked landlines” part since it was confusing and added nothing, but, for reference, I was referring to a practice of address-based sampling (ABS) where addresses are sometimes matched out to landlines to make it easier to contact them for responses. These often leads to particular sampling bias (which can sometimes be addressed by creating separate sets of addresses that can be matched and those that cannot). It is sort of a middle ground between randomly sampling addresses and landline surveys (randomly sampling numbers has a lot of issues).
Since surveys using landlines are generally more prone to bogus responses, I had referenced that in my example, but on reflection is a needless nuance that doesn’t change the point being made.
I will probably try to reword a few things pursuant to some other areas you marked tomorrow, time permitting.