Sorry, that’s my poor phrasing—the 53% and 29% are directly comparable. 10⁄19 GS people scored 2-5, compared to 6⁄21 non-GS.
From the report:
The percentages of subjects who offered aid by situational variable were, for low hurry, 63% offered help, intermediate hurry 45%, and high hurry 10%; for helping-relevant message 53%, task-relevant message 29%.
Sorry, that’s my poor phrasing—the 53% and 29% are directly comparable. 10⁄19 GS people scored 2-5, compared to 6⁄21 non-GS.
From the report:
I’ve changed the phrasing in the OP.
Got it, thanks!