How did you conclude that people who prepared GS are actually more likely to help than other people? Just from eyeballing 10⁄19 and 6⁄21 I can’t conclude that this is enough evidence, only that this is suggestive.
From a Bayesian perspective, my prior would be that the GS condition would make people more likely to help. The likelihood calculation reinforces this belief. In terms of bits, my prior would have been (conservatively) 2-3 bits in favour of an effect and the experiment adds another 3-4(?) so I end up on about 6 bits. 64:1 is pretty good.
How did you conclude that people who prepared GS are actually more likely to help than other people? Just from eyeballing 10⁄19 and 6⁄21 I can’t conclude that this is enough evidence, only that this is suggestive.
From a frequentist perspective you’re right.
From a Bayesian perspective, my prior would be that the GS condition would make people more likely to help. The likelihood calculation reinforces this belief. In terms of bits, my prior would have been (conservatively) 2-3 bits in favour of an effect and the experiment adds another 3-4(?) so I end up on about 6 bits. 64:1 is pretty good.