No. The trivial objection is that you need science to build AI and AI hardware. My real objection is that we don’t know if it’s going to take ten or a hundred years to build AI and I’d rather not put all our eggs in one risky basket.
I mean we should focus on science which is useful to build AI and AI hardware. I think there’re some sciences useless to build AGI( like string theory, cosmology,...)
No. The trivial objection is that you need science to build AI and AI hardware. My real objection is that we don’t know if it’s going to take ten or a hundred years to build AI and I’d rather not put all our eggs in one risky basket.
I mean we should focus on science which is useful to build AI and AI hardware. I think there’re some sciences useless to build AGI( like string theory, cosmology,...)