As the original post mentioned, the Industrial Revolution wasn’t very good for horses.
I recognize that. But it seems kind of lame to respond to a critique of an analogy by simply falling back on another, separate analogy. (Though I’m not totally sure if that’s your intention here.)
As the original post mentioned, the Industrial Revolution wasn’t very good for horses.
I recognize that. But it seems kind of lame to respond to a critique of an analogy by simply falling back on another, separate analogy. (Though I’m not totally sure if that’s your intention here.)