A product I am hoping to ship within the next month is a kind of post on LessWrong that is a short intro essay (5-10 paragraphs, roughly the size of this shortform), together with a giant pile of LLM context and the choice of an associated chat model that users chat with to understand the concept introduced in the opening essay. Authors can read the chats and make adjustment to the context to help readers understand the ideas they want to convey better.
That feels like maybe the correct way to convey something like this. In general I do think a feature of LLM writing is that it’s often pretty decent at conveying things when it’s interactive, but kind of terrible if I wasn’t the person who prompted the LLM and have it answer questions I specifically am interested in.
Just in case this is helpful, one reason I hesitated to post the NotebookLM link was that it will immediately take the “discussion” off of the place where I posted it, to a place where I can’t possibly follow up or even see that there is interest. Maybe there’s something you could do in your implementation to mitigate this.
Yes, I mean that’s why I would want the chat to be somehow available on-site (or maybe for there to be some way to connect a local LLM to the context through us), and for the author to be able to read the exchanges people have with the model (and of course to still have a comment section and voting right below it and stuff).
A product I am hoping to ship within the next month is a kind of post on LessWrong that is a short intro essay (5-10 paragraphs, roughly the size of this shortform), together with a giant pile of LLM context and the choice of an associated chat model that users chat with to understand the concept introduced in the opening essay. Authors can read the chats and make adjustment to the context to help readers understand the ideas they want to convey better.
That feels like maybe the correct way to convey something like this. In general I do think a feature of LLM writing is that it’s often pretty decent at conveying things when it’s interactive, but kind of terrible if I wasn’t the person who prompted the LLM and have it answer questions I specifically am interested in.
Just in case this is helpful, one reason I hesitated to post the NotebookLM link was that it will immediately take the “discussion” off of the place where I posted it, to a place where I can’t possibly follow up or even see that there is interest. Maybe there’s something you could do in your implementation to mitigate this.
Yes, I mean that’s why I would want the chat to be somehow available on-site (or maybe for there to be some way to connect a local LLM to the context through us), and for the author to be able to read the exchanges people have with the model (and of course to still have a comment section and voting right below it and stuff).