If we assume that Mathematical universe hypothesis is true, as EY and Tegrmark did, and all possible math structures actually exist, it means that any possible AIs also exist. More over, for any AI there is another AI (and not one) which is simulating the first AI and its world.
Thus we are simulated by infinitely large AI, which could be interpreted as a proof that “God exists”. However, the practical meaning of it could be only some update of the simulation hypothesis.
If we assume that Mathematical universe hypothesis is true, as EY and Tegrmark did, and all possible math structures actually exist, it means that any possible AIs also exist. More over, for any AI there is another AI (and not one) which is simulating the first AI and its world.
Thus we are simulated by infinitely large AI, which could be interpreted as a proof that “God exists”. However, the practical meaning of it could be only some update of the simulation hypothesis.