# Dweomite comments on The Telephone Theorem: Information At A Distance Is Mediated By Deterministic Constraints

• Kinda sounds like the important part is not the blankets themselves, but the relationships between them? That is, a Markov blanket is just any partition of the graph, but it’s important that you can assert that is “separating” and . (Whereas if you just took 3 random partitions, none of them would necessarily separate the other 2.)

Or is it more like—we don’t actually have any explicit representation of the entire causal model, so we can’t necessarily use a partition to calculate all the edges that cross that partition, and the Markov blanket is like a list of the edges, rather than a list of the nodes? Every partition describes a Markov blanket, but not every set of edges does, so saying that this particular set of edges forms a Markov blanket is a non-trivial statement about those edges?

• These are both correct. The first is right in most applications of Markov blankets. The second is relevant mainly in e.g. science, where figuring out the causal structure is part of the problem. In science, we can experimentally test whether mediates the interaction between and (i.e. whether is a Markov blanket between and ), and then we can back out information about the causal structure from that.