I just can’t believe the claims in that greentext. 95% of <90 IQ cannot understand “if you had not eaten all day yesterday, how would you feel in the evening?”. That’s 25% of the population. It’s over 50% of certain large demographic subdivisions.
I do! Never seen that one before. It’s interesting. I wish I had an easy way to confirm its accuracy, but the more I think about it, the more of my real life experience I connect it to.
The recursion example rings especially true. It’s not just in writing that the ability to do recursion seems to have a hard g cutoff.
That greentext helps me understand other people so much better. I take the ability to distinguish ethical anachronisms for granted, and hadn’t realized how difficult it must be for other people.
You might like this classic 4chan greentext: link.
I just can’t believe the claims in that greentext. 95% of <90 IQ cannot understand “if you had not eaten all day yesterday, how would you feel in the evening?”. That’s 25% of the population. It’s over 50% of certain large demographic subdivisions.
I do! Never seen that one before. It’s interesting. I wish I had an easy way to confirm its accuracy, but the more I think about it, the more of my real life experience I connect it to.
The recursion example rings especially true. It’s not just in writing that the ability to do recursion seems to have a hard g cutoff.
That greentext helps me understand other people so much better. I take the ability to distinguish ethical anachronisms for granted, and hadn’t realized how difficult it must be for other people.
There’s another post in that series the first link missed. Look at the end of this one: link (sorry, low res image).