I guess I should have inserted in there that “We can’t RUN A BUSINESS AND do CC-BY-SA”. Of course we could use that license but then everyone would just share the recordings for free.
Who do you mean when you say everyone? Do you think that billions of people are going to share those recordings for free? Even more perplexing. If you think that they do, having a subset of your collection be shared by billions would probably have a very good return on the investment because it promotes your website and not all the products of your website have to be CC-BY-SA.
For most commerical successful infoproducts it’s possible to download them for free on some file sharing platform. People pay for those products usually because they think it’s fair to pay the creator of the product in return for the value that they created.
Most of that time file sharing is illegal but websites like Zenhabits show that successful businesses who give up on all copyright protection for their work do exist.
Very true. It’s hard to know how everyone will use the files once they get them onto the computer. What would happen if we released all copyright protection like Zenhabits? I have no idea. It’s an interesting idea. I wonder how it would play out in reality. I’m not sure if you’ve noticed but we do have Eliezer’s large essay “The Simple Truth” available for free so people can try out the service.
LessWrong is a unique situation for us. Most of the other blogs we will be partnering with are written by a sole blogger who will want us to use some form of copyright protection. This is why we’ve asked for opinions on the topic here to see what everyone would like to do.
I personally think that an opt-out or opt-in system seems the most fair as it gives the individual the option.
I’m not sure if you’ve noticed but we do have Eliezer’s large essay “The Simple Truth” available for free so people can try out the service.
There are two different kinds of freedom. People can download “The Simple Truth” from you without paying anything. They however are not free to remix it and create derivative works based on it.
Most of the other blogs we will be partnering with are written by a sole blogger who will want us to use some form of copyright protection.
On your end I don’t see a need to license every recording the same way. Specifically it wouldn’t cost much to make an experiement.
Two channels with similar LessWrong content. At the start ask every author for permission.
One channel gets a closed license the other gets CC-BY-SA. Both get the same price. It would be interesting to know the practical effects. Does the closed license channel sell better?
How widely will the CC-BY-SA content get distributed?
Who do you mean when you say everyone? Do you think that billions of people are going to share those recordings for free? Even more perplexing. If you think that they do, having a subset of your collection be shared by billions would probably have a very good return on the investment because it promotes your website and not all the products of your website have to be CC-BY-SA.
For most commerical successful infoproducts it’s possible to download them for free on some file sharing platform. People pay for those products usually because they think it’s fair to pay the creator of the product in return for the value that they created.
Most of that time file sharing is illegal but websites like Zenhabits show that successful businesses who give up on all copyright protection for their work do exist.
Very true. It’s hard to know how everyone will use the files once they get them onto the computer. What would happen if we released all copyright protection like Zenhabits? I have no idea. It’s an interesting idea. I wonder how it would play out in reality. I’m not sure if you’ve noticed but we do have Eliezer’s large essay “The Simple Truth” available for free so people can try out the service.
LessWrong is a unique situation for us. Most of the other blogs we will be partnering with are written by a sole blogger who will want us to use some form of copyright protection. This is why we’ve asked for opinions on the topic here to see what everyone would like to do.
I personally think that an opt-out or opt-in system seems the most fair as it gives the individual the option.
There are two different kinds of freedom. People can download “The Simple Truth” from you without paying anything. They however are not free to remix it and create derivative works based on it.
On your end I don’t see a need to license every recording the same way. Specifically it wouldn’t cost much to make an experiement. Two channels with similar LessWrong content. At the start ask every author for permission.
One channel gets a closed license the other gets CC-BY-SA. Both get the same price. It would be interesting to know the practical effects. Does the closed license channel sell better? How widely will the CC-BY-SA content get distributed?