This post seems to be arguing that people consistently overvalue moral goods and undervalue material goods.
Huh? I read Shalmanese’s post as arguing that some moral goods are “moral junk food” and impede your progress towards other, more “wholesome” moral goods—not necessarily material. This thesis strikes me as correct, but for some reason the commenters aren’t addressing it directly.
Huh? I read Shalmanese’s post as arguing that some moral goods are “moral junk food” and impede your progress towards other, more “wholesome” moral goods—not necessarily material. This thesis strikes me as correct, but for some reason the commenters aren’t addressing it directly.