I put the story in your first link “Real Time The Sunday before Claire turns sixty-five...” into Pangram and got 62% AI. My current way of interpreting these numbers is: if the scores is anything above 0% AI, treat the text as very possibly fully AI written. Also consider that if someone is using AI to write part of a piece, they’re probably using AI to either re-write what they wrote or just write the whole piece. I think a process like “I have a piece I want to write, I write 5 paragraphs I’m super happy with, I ask AI to write the last 5 paragraphs and don’t have it rework my first 5 paragraphs” is very uncommon.
With a paid account, you can see the parts it considers human-written or AI-written. For the story in the first link, it falls below 50% once the em dashes are replaced and it thinks the first half is AI-written while the rest is human-written. One of the stories in the second link is rated as 100% human-written after more iterations.
I put the story in your first link “Real Time The Sunday before Claire turns sixty-five...” into Pangram and got 62% AI.
My current way of interpreting these numbers is: if the scores is anything above 0% AI, treat the text as very possibly fully AI written. Also consider that if someone is using AI to write part of a piece, they’re probably using AI to either re-write what they wrote or just write the whole piece. I think a process like “I have a piece I want to write, I write 5 paragraphs I’m super happy with, I ask AI to write the last 5 paragraphs and don’t have it rework my first 5 paragraphs” is very uncommon.
With a paid account, you can see the parts it considers human-written or AI-written. For the story in the first link, it falls below 50% once the em dashes are replaced and it thinks the first half is AI-written while the rest is human-written. One of the stories in the second link is rated as 100% human-written after more iterations.