You are free to look for any flaws regarding his arguments in the papers he published in the peer reviewed journal of 911 studies.
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
They might as well have named it the journal of 911 conspiracy rationalizations, since every paper (I clicked on) aims to cast doubts on the official explanation. ”...and therefore the US government is hiding something” seems to be their pre-written conclusion.
You are free to look for any flaws regarding his arguments in the papers he published in the peer reviewed journal of 911 studies. http://www.journalof911studies.com/
Peer review isn’t magic trust dust. Looking at their website, I don’t see any details on their review process or why I should trust them.
They might as well have named it the journal of 911 conspiracy rationalizations, since every paper (I clicked on) aims to cast doubts on the official explanation. ”...and therefore the US government is hiding something” seems to be their pre-written conclusion.