I think you meant “provoking” arguments … but that was not my intention.
Can you suggest a different word to replace “debunking” which conveys “exposing the falseness of an idea, or belief, which is currently being promoted by a large number of people, with serious consequences”?
I am open to changing the title, if that can be done, and if you can think of a word that conveys the intended meaning.
I think you meant “provoking” arguments … but that was not my intention.
Can you suggest a different word to replace “debunking” which conveys “exposing the falseness of an idea, or belief, which is currently being promoted by a large number of people, with serious consequences”?
I am open to changing the title, if that can be done, and if you can think of a word that conveys the intended meaning.
No, I really meant that you are providing arguments, and that had better have been your intention!
Your expanded wording doesn’t really convey an openness to being argued-against.
Like, ‘Here are some flaws I see in the argument presented’ is one thing.
‘Your idea is totally wrong, I will expose its falseness’ is another.
Also, I’m not seeing the serious consequences of being overly cautious in respect to AI development.
I think “exposing” fallacies would be a step in the right direction here.