Taking the cryonics mindset to its logical conclusion, the most “rational” thing to do is commit suicide at age 30 and have yourself cryopreserved.
That might follow if you assign certain probabilities, utilities and discount factors, but it certainly isn’t the obvious logical conclusion. Even for most cryonics advocates, very likely living for at least 40 years more beats the a small extra chance of being revived in the future. “Paying a bit extra for the chance of being revived later on is worth it” does not equal “killing yourself for the chance of being revived later on is worth it”.
(Not even if we assumed the most inconvenient possible world where committing suicide at the age of 30 actually did improve your chances of getting successfully cryopreserved—in the world we live in, the following police investigation etc. would probably just reduce the odds.)
That might follow if you assign certain probabilities, utilities and discount factors, but it certainly isn’t the obvious logical conclusion. Even for most cryonics advocates, very likely living for at least 40 years more beats the a small extra chance of being revived in the future. “Paying a bit extra for the chance of being revived later on is worth it” does not equal “killing yourself for the chance of being revived later on is worth it”.
(Not even if we assumed the most inconvenient possible world where committing suicide at the age of 30 actually did improve your chances of getting successfully cryopreserved—in the world we live in, the following police investigation etc. would probably just reduce the odds.)
What is the calculated utility of signing up for cryonics? I’ve never seen a figure.
It’ll vary drastically depending on who you ask. Hanson puts the worth of cryonic suspension at $125,000, assuming 50K$/year income.