How does one tell apart a person who “relays a neutral history of their intellectual development” from the one who threatens and/or cheerleads? Additionally, I don’t buy the analogy with animal welfare and eating meat. Alas, I don’t know any far-right blogs further to the right thanthistrio which claim that the far Left somehow managed to occupy such a big piece of the political and epistemic environment and post such BS that the only unaffected sources are the ones which are far to the right. One of the authors even used the term ‘Scout Mindset’ in order to try and persuade the readers that the left’s epistemic stance is deeply corrupt.
How does one tell apart a person who “relays a neutral history of their intellectual development” from the one who threatens and/or cheerleads? Additionally, I don’t buy the analogy with animal welfare and eating meat. Alas, I don’t know any far-right blogs further to the right than this trio which claim that the far Left somehow managed to occupy such a big piece of the political and epistemic environment and post such BS that the only unaffected sources are the ones which are far to the right. One of the authors even used the term ‘Scout Mindset’ in order to try and persuade the readers that the left’s epistemic stance is deeply corrupt.
Political commitments are not propositional beliefs. That’s the difference.