“Human Compatible” is making basically the same points as “Superintelligence,” only in a dumbed-down and streamlined manner, with lots of present-day examples to illustrate.
I do not agree with this. I think the arguments in Human Compatible are more convincing than the ones in Superintelligence (mostly because they make fewer questionable assumptions).
(I agree that Stuart probably does agree somewhat with the “Bostromian position”.)
Interesting. Well, I imagine you don’t have the time right now, but I just want to register that I’d love to hear more about this. What questionable assumptions does Superintelligence make, that aren’t made by Human Compatible? (This request for info goes out to everyone, not just Rohin)