Senses turn the environment into cognitive objects. Their “left side” is signficantly different from the “right side”. Having “white wine” → “white wine” as identity operation seems misleading.
The wine situation seems perfectly natural if you have “tastes like wine”+”visual transparent”->”white wine” and “tastes like wine”+”visual red”-> “red wine”. Like the japanese have r and l within the same letter, if you have “white wine” and “red wine” within the same “taste” that is not prior overriding the experience that is experience bookkeeping class-delineations being wide ie ambigious.
What is upkeeping the forced exposure phobia is the trauma. It might not be about dogs any more but more of fear of fear itself.
In the political sense, if you take challenging input seriusly it can make upkeeping a picture of the world more muddled, conflicting and laboursome. This can feel like a failure and it can feel like producing a bad model ie an epistemological punishment. Whereas processing beliefs that are aligned to you is easy and generates workable insights more rapidly. Even beside making you the hero of the story, it more succesfully makes a story ie generates workable representations. So if one wants to faciliate political discussion then avoiding feelings of confusion might make sense.
Senses turn the environment into cognitive objects. Their “left side” is signficantly different from the “right side”. Having “white wine” → “white wine” as identity operation seems misleading.
The wine situation seems perfectly natural if you have “tastes like wine”+”visual transparent”->”white wine” and “tastes like wine”+”visual red”-> “red wine”. Like the japanese have r and l within the same letter, if you have “white wine” and “red wine” within the same “taste” that is not prior overriding the experience that is experience bookkeeping class-delineations being wide ie ambigious.
What is upkeeping the forced exposure phobia is the trauma. It might not be about dogs any more but more of fear of fear itself.
In the political sense, if you take challenging input seriusly it can make upkeeping a picture of the world more muddled, conflicting and laboursome. This can feel like a failure and it can feel like producing a bad model ie an epistemological punishment. Whereas processing beliefs that are aligned to you is easy and generates workable insights more rapidly. Even beside making you the hero of the story, it more succesfully makes a story ie generates workable representations. So if one wants to faciliate political discussion then avoiding feelings of confusion might make sense.