I’d like there to be a reaction of “Not Exhaustive”, meant for a step where comment (or top-level post, for that matter) missed an important case—how a particular situation could play out, perhaps, or an essential system’s component is not listed. An example use: on statement “to prevent any data leaks, one must protect how their systems transfer data and how they process it” with the missed component being protection of storage as well.
I recall wishing for it like three times since the New Year, with the current trigger being this comment:
Elon already has all of the money in the world. I think he and his employs are ideologically driven, and as far as I can tell they’re making sensible decisions given their stated goals of reducing unnecessary spend/sprawl. I seriously doubt they’re going to use this access to either raid the treasury or turn it into a personal fiefdom. <...>
which misses a specific case (which I’ll name under the original comment if there is any interest).
I’d like there to be a reaction of “Not Exhaustive”, meant for a step where comment (or top-level post, for that matter) missed an important case—how a particular situation could play out, perhaps, or an essential system’s component is not listed. An example use: on statement “to prevent any data leaks, one must protect how their systems transfer data and how they process it” with the missed component being protection of storage as well.
I recall wishing for it like three times since the New Year, with the current trigger being this comment:
which misses a specific case (which I’ll name under the original comment if there is any interest).
(I like it, seems like a cool idea and maybe worth a try, and indeed a common thing that people mess up)