The judgment “unfriendly” turned out to be triggered by a combination of specific stimuli that were all fixable without improving the friendliness of any individual community members.
To be clear though, they haven’t actually done this yet, right? They have a plausible story and an angle of attack. But as far as I know they haven’t checked that these specific stimuli are what trigger the “unfriendly” judgement. (Again, it’s plausible, but we’re now talking about people other than Sara, doing a different thing than Sara, and receiving different stimuli than Sara received. There’s a lot of room for error.) And as far as I know they haven’t managed to remove the “unfriendly” judgment.
(I might have missed something. I tried to skim their blog for updates since the linked post, but I couldn’t see a chronological list of blog entries.)
To be clear though, they haven’t actually done this yet, right? They have a plausible story and an angle of attack. But as far as I know they haven’t checked that these specific stimuli are what trigger the “unfriendly” judgement. (Again, it’s plausible, but we’re now talking about people other than Sara, doing a different thing than Sara, and receiving different stimuli than Sara received. There’s a lot of room for error.) And as far as I know they haven’t managed to remove the “unfriendly” judgment.
(I might have missed something. I tried to skim their blog for updates since the linked post, but I couldn’t see a chronological list of blog entries.)