A lot of this post sounds like the NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming) way of dealing with mental models.
NLP is not without it’s flaws but a lot of people invested a lot of time into building it.
If you want to go deeper into modeling mental processes in a pragmatic way I would recommend you to read The Emprint Method by Leslie Cameron-Bandler.
The book speaks about how to do modeling of thought processes and presents notation for how to do it.
Just to be clear. There’s plenty of NLP literature that’s pragmatic in the sense of wanting to offer quick fixes or specific tricks. This book is not that kind of book but more meta and how to do modelling.
A lot of this post sounds like the NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming) way of dealing with mental models.
NLP is not without it’s flaws but a lot of people invested a lot of time into building it.
If you want to go deeper into modeling mental processes in a pragmatic way I would recommend you to read The Emprint Method by Leslie Cameron-Bandler. The book speaks about how to do modeling of thought processes and presents notation for how to do it.
Huh, okay. Yeah, I suspect that everything I’m coming to terms with has already been integrated in some form by people across time / communities.
I do like pragmatism, so I’m making a note to check out the Cameron-Bandler book. Thanks for the reference!
Just to be clear. There’s plenty of NLP literature that’s pragmatic in the sense of wanting to offer quick fixes or specific tricks. This book is not that kind of book but more meta and how to do modelling.
Got it. Thanks for the clarification.