I’d reference this comment. It gives a lot more information than 10-70% which sounds very strange and like you’re maybe hiding something.
Of course it’s the provenance of the claims more than the words that matters. I’m guessing you came up with the claims largely independent of Claude and I’d say that too even though it’s even harder to track that.
I don’t think you need to track every edit to explain to people roughly how the process went.
Thanks, I can expand my LLM note a bit more! I just remembered that I have a backup of my full conversation (up to the point where I took the backup, but almost all of it) with Claude, including the first drafts.
Having thought and read about psychopathy for so long, I felt very confused about how to structure my mental model, so my input to Claude were countless fairly unorganized thoughts about models, contradictions, advantages and disadvantages of framings, etc., and Claude’s first big contribution was to suggest this tag structure where tags (made up of a letter and a descriptor) get combined to form a personality profile. That was a format that hadn’t occurred to me and that I loved for its power and flexibility. But then it was me again who fleshed out that model – introduced the layers of genetics, neurology, psychodynamics, behavior, etc.
I’d reference this comment. It gives a lot more information than 10-70% which sounds very strange and like you’re maybe hiding something.
Of course it’s the provenance of the claims more than the words that matters. I’m guessing you came up with the claims largely independent of Claude and I’d say that too even though it’s even harder to track that.
I don’t think you need to track every edit to explain to people roughly how the process went.
Thanks, I can expand my LLM note a bit more! I just remembered that I have a backup of my full conversation (up to the point where I took the backup, but almost all of it) with Claude, including the first drafts.
Having thought and read about psychopathy for so long, I felt very confused about how to structure my mental model, so my input to Claude were countless fairly unorganized thoughts about models, contradictions, advantages and disadvantages of framings, etc., and Claude’s first big contribution was to suggest this tag structure where tags (made up of a letter and a descriptor) get combined to form a personality profile. That was a format that hadn’t occurred to me and that I loved for its power and flexibility. But then it was me again who fleshed out that model – introduced the layers of genetics, neurology, psychodynamics, behavior, etc.