Yeah, I didn’t keep track of what words were written by who. It’s quite plausible that I’ve touched every single sentenced and wrote almost half of them from scratch, but it’s also plausible that I touched maybe 80% of sentences and wrote 20% from scratch. The Choice article is mostly hand-written because the AI didn’t have a lot of ideas, but this one is more mixed. It’s hard for me to reconstruct at this point. In the future I can try to commit all changes to Git with correct attribution and then share the whole edit history for transparency. (But really, when two people coauthor an article, it’s also often not clear who wrote which sentences, contributed which ideas, did which edits during the proofreading, etc.)
I’ll move the collapsible box to the top if it lets me! (The editor gets a bit weird when I use these blocks.)
I’d reference this comment. It gives a lot more information than 10-70% which sounds very strange and like you’re maybe hiding something.
Of course it’s the provenance of the claims more than the words that matters. I’m guessing you came up with the claims largely independent of Claude and I’d say that too even though it’s even harder to track that.
I don’t think you need to track every edit to explain to people roughly how the process went.
Thanks, I can expand my LLM note a bit more! I just remembered that I have a backup of my full conversation (up to the point where I took the backup, but almost all of it) with Claude, including the first drafts.
Having thought and read about psychopathy for so long, I felt very confused about how to structure my mental model, so my input to Claude were countless fairly unorganized thoughts about models, contradictions, advantages and disadvantages of framings, etc., and Claude’s first big contribution was to suggest this tag structure where tags (made up of a letter and a descriptor) get combined to form a personality profile. That was a format that hadn’t occurred to me and that I loved for its power and flexibility. But then it was me again who fleshed out that model – introduced the layers of genetics, neurology, psychodynamics, behavior, etc.
Thanks! <3
Yeah, I didn’t keep track of what words were written by who. It’s quite plausible that I’ve touched every single sentenced and wrote almost half of them from scratch, but it’s also plausible that I touched maybe 80% of sentences and wrote 20% from scratch. The Choice article is mostly hand-written because the AI didn’t have a lot of ideas, but this one is more mixed. It’s hard for me to reconstruct at this point. In the future I can try to commit all changes to Git with correct attribution and then share the whole edit history for transparency. (But really, when two people coauthor an article, it’s also often not clear who wrote which sentences, contributed which ideas, did which edits during the proofreading, etc.)
I’ll move the collapsible box to the top if it lets me! (The editor gets a bit weird when I use these blocks.)
I’d reference this comment. It gives a lot more information than 10-70% which sounds very strange and like you’re maybe hiding something.
Of course it’s the provenance of the claims more than the words that matters. I’m guessing you came up with the claims largely independent of Claude and I’d say that too even though it’s even harder to track that.
I don’t think you need to track every edit to explain to people roughly how the process went.
Thanks, I can expand my LLM note a bit more! I just remembered that I have a backup of my full conversation (up to the point where I took the backup, but almost all of it) with Claude, including the first drafts.
Having thought and read about psychopathy for so long, I felt very confused about how to structure my mental model, so my input to Claude were countless fairly unorganized thoughts about models, contradictions, advantages and disadvantages of framings, etc., and Claude’s first big contribution was to suggest this tag structure where tags (made up of a letter and a descriptor) get combined to form a personality profile. That was a format that hadn’t occurred to me and that I loved for its power and flexibility. But then it was me again who fleshed out that model – introduced the layers of genetics, neurology, psychodynamics, behavior, etc.