So my current guess about your posts is that you’re making them progressively more sarcastic to see at what point most of the comments stop being, “Are you serious?”
I’m not sure if this post is being downvoted because people think you’re serious, or because it is a silly* post complaining about the two-party system which might be better suited to the Open Thread, or some other reason.
*The complaint itself isn’t silly. I tend to agree with a lot of it. But the way it is made here is rather over-the-top.
It is not complaining about the two-party system. It is about a much more general phenomenon, found widely in academia. It is important to note that in any domain, whenever you reduce the number of alternatives to two, it sets the stage for vicious partisanship. I happen to think it’s a very important point.
The post isn’t sarcastic; it’s humorous, taking on the persona of a Dark Arts instructor.
Dunno about “step one” or “Light Arts”, but that’s usually among my first responses to being offered a forced choice between A and B… what are the alternatives that aren’t being considered?
Not so much to avoid vicious partisanship… people can be viciously partisan for their side no matter how many competing sides there are… but because it’s hard to consider the merits of options that have been arbitrarily excluded from consideration, and those options often prove viable when their merits are considered.
I am especially prone to this for subjects where certain positions have become popular tribal markers.
So my current guess about your posts is that you’re making them progressively more sarcastic to see at what point most of the comments stop being, “Are you serious?”
I’m not sure if this post is being downvoted because people think you’re serious, or because it is a silly* post complaining about the two-party system which might be better suited to the Open Thread, or some other reason.
*The complaint itself isn’t silly. I tend to agree with a lot of it. But the way it is made here is rather over-the-top.
It is not complaining about the two-party system. It is about a much more general phenomenon, found widely in academia. It is important to note that in any domain, whenever you reduce the number of alternatives to two, it sets the stage for vicious partisanship. I happen to think it’s a very important point.
The post isn’t sarcastic; it’s humorous, taking on the persona of a Dark Arts instructor.
Only a sith would think that only a sith deals in absolutes. I reject your absolutist opposition to absolutes.
Sometimes there really are just two choices. Dualisms get a bad rap.
Could you give academic examples?
So that step one in the Light Arts is to increase the alternatives?
Dunno about “step one” or “Light Arts”, but that’s usually among my first responses to being offered a forced choice between A and B… what are the alternatives that aren’t being considered?
Not so much to avoid vicious partisanship… people can be viciously partisan for their side no matter how many competing sides there are… but because it’s hard to consider the merits of options that have been arbitrarily excluded from consideration, and those options often prove viable when their merits are considered.
I am especially prone to this for subjects where certain positions have become popular tribal markers.