Thank you for bringing this to my attention. As a matter of fact in the linked comment Radford Neal is dealing with a weak-man, while conveniently assuming that other alternatives “are beyond the bounds of rational discussion”, which is very much not the case.
But it is indeed a decent argument that deserves a detailed rebuttal. And I’ll make sure to provide it in the future.
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. As a matter of fact in the linked comment Radford Neal is dealing with a weak-man, while conveniently assuming that other alternatives “are beyond the bounds of rational discussion”, which is very much not the case.
But it is indeed a decent argument that deserves a detailed rebuttal. And I’ll make sure to provide it in the future.
Please do so in a post, I subscribed to those