Now I’m not sure whether you were (originally) trying to start a discussion about how the term “lethal autonomy” should be used, or if you intended to imply something to the effect of “lethal autonomy isn’t a new threat, therefore we shouldn’t be concerned about it”.
Even if I was wrong in my interpretation of your message, I’m still glad I responded the way I did—this is one of those topic where it’s best if nobody finds excuses to go into denial, default to optimism bias, or otherwise fail to see the risk.
Do you view lethally autonomous robots as a potential threat to freedom and democracy?
Now I’m not sure whether you were (originally) trying to start a discussion about how the term “lethal autonomy” should be used, or if you intended to imply something to the effect of “lethal autonomy isn’t a new threat, therefore we shouldn’t be concerned about it”.
Even if I was wrong in my interpretation of your message, I’m still glad I responded the way I did—this is one of those topic where it’s best if nobody finds excuses to go into denial, default to optimism bias, or otherwise fail to see the risk.
Do you view lethally autonomous robots as a potential threat to freedom and democracy?
I dunno. I’m just a compulsive nitpicker.
Lol. Well thank you for admitting this.