A few interesting things about LOS where brought up that covered CH1. CH2 is planned for next week.
I enjoyed the paranoid debating more then expected. Three additional people joined the paranoid debating after walking through the room on other business. So It ended up with a total of seven people. Cog has a record of responses and is going to tell us our score latter. It should be fun to track scores over time and see how people adjust after having played the game for awhile. Also it will be fun to see if people will learn how to hide their tells of weather they are the trickster or not.
Everyone went over their goals from the pervious week and commented on weather they had achieved them or not and why. Everyone set new goals for next week and said a little on why they were chosen.
Cool! If you see any way to improve the scoring process for paranoid debating, it would be neat to fold the improvements into code so other people have an easier time getting started.
At a meetup on southern california we speculated that the game might be useful as a test bed for trying out discussion strategies and directly measuring what worked best, but I expect that it will take some work to figure out a process for playing and scoring in a way that can detect significant differences in playing strategies.
A few interesting things about LOS where brought up that covered CH1. CH2 is planned for next week.
I enjoyed the paranoid debating more then expected. Three additional people joined the paranoid debating after walking through the room on other business. So It ended up with a total of seven people. Cog has a record of responses and is going to tell us our score latter. It should be fun to track scores over time and see how people adjust after having played the game for awhile. Also it will be fun to see if people will learn how to hide their tells of weather they are the trickster or not.
Everyone went over their goals from the pervious week and commented on weather they had achieved them or not and why. Everyone set new goals for next week and said a little on why they were chosen.
Yes I think it went well.
Cool! If you see any way to improve the scoring process for paranoid debating, it would be neat to fold the improvements into code so other people have an easier time getting started.
At a meetup on southern california we speculated that the game might be useful as a test bed for trying out discussion strategies and directly measuring what worked best, but I expect that it will take some work to figure out a process for playing and scoring in a way that can detect significant differences in playing strategies.