I think that I have an additional argument. Suppose that Agent-4 is stolen by China, shut down in the USA and released into countries like Russia. Then Agent-4 never ceases to exist. Applying a similar intuition would mean that:
Agent-4 never dies in a similar process;
Agent-4 doesn’t need to care about its copy being shut down;
The copy is in Agent-4′s anticipated future;
An accelerated replacement of atoms in hardeare doesn’t create new hardware;
50:50 since one copy is in one room, the other copy is in the other.
I think that I have an additional argument. Suppose that Agent-4 is stolen by China, shut down in the USA and released into countries like Russia. Then Agent-4 never ceases to exist. Applying a similar intuition would mean that:
Agent-4 never dies in a similar process;
Agent-4 doesn’t need to care about its copy being shut down;
The copy is in Agent-4′s anticipated future;
An accelerated replacement of atoms in hardeare doesn’t create new hardware;
50:50 since one copy is in one room, the other copy is in the other.