I am imagining figuratively “grasping for air” in the end of the slow turn which would seem to make early fast turn and late fast turns have different attention profiles.
I guess I have a image about if every turn had a chance to be fast or slow then it is more vivid that the question how that turn would have went if it was the other type. Also knowing that both players have their fast turns simultaneusly avoids feeling the edge that the speeds have against each other (being sloppy is not that bad when the exploiter is also confused).
Having random amounts and at also potentially in the beginning would make the players think more about the value of such things. I would imagine being able to see the weak spots in fast plays would make players hope for slow turns in the “weak spots”. Similarly of using a coin and noting on what side you want it to land rather than on which side it lands.
I am imagining figuratively “grasping for air” in the end of the slow turn which would seem to make early fast turn and late fast turns have different attention profiles.
I guess I have a image about if every turn had a chance to be fast or slow then it is more vivid that the question how that turn would have went if it was the other type. Also knowing that both players have their fast turns simultaneusly avoids feeling the edge that the speeds have against each other (being sloppy is not that bad when the exploiter is also confused).
Having random amounts and at also potentially in the beginning would make the players think more about the value of such things. I would imagine being able to see the weak spots in fast plays would make players hope for slow turns in the “weak spots”. Similarly of using a coin and noting on what side you want it to land rather than on which side it lands.