“In New Zealand, the choice to attend a single-sex school is not a result of a family’s desire that their child attend a religious or military institution; choice is primarily determined by which school the pupil can most easily walk to.”
I mean, sure, it makes lots of sense that walking distance would be a core mediator, but what evidence do they have that walking distance is determined by chance, rather than being influenced by the family’s desired school or resources?
I mean, sure, it makes lots of sense that walking distance would be a core mediator, but what evidence do they have that walking distance is determined by chance, rather than being influenced by the family’s desired school or resources?