I might think “framing” is what it is about. I don’t really see that as an different than what occurs when academics are writing papers where perhaps other schools of thought have a different take and are coming to different conclusions.
Do you find, even just personally, that there’s a particular high ‘info profit’ from you getting access to “framing” from watching government hearings?
‘Framing’ – assuming I understand what you mean by that precisely enough – doesn’t seem like the kind of thing that I feel like I’m missing before these hearings start. The framing is, AFAICT, always ‘pre-released’.
I might think “framing” is what it is about. I don’t really see that as an different than what occurs when academics are writing papers where perhaps other schools of thought have a different take and are coming to different conclusions.
Do you find, even just personally, that there’s a particular high ‘info profit’ from you getting access to “framing” from watching government hearings?
‘Framing’ – assuming I understand what you mean by that precisely enough – doesn’t seem like the kind of thing that I feel like I’m missing before these hearings start. The framing is, AFAICT, always ‘pre-released’.