One represents a belief in an inviolable positive right to life and health, the other represents a belief that life exists solely at the discretion of society/authority.
These are not the only possible intentions behind these policies, and not all support or opposition to them is based on those particular intentions.
In particular I suspect most of the supporters of universal healthcare think of it as a positive right to life/health, whereas most of it’s opponents think of it as a issue of governmental power.
Similarly, I suspect supporters of drone strikes think of it in terms of justice and/or preventing terrorism, whereas most of it’s opponents think of it as a issue of governmental power.
Thus people who don’t see governmental power as a problem, or are simply not inclined to think about it and its implications are likely to be more favorable to both.
These are not the only possible intentions behind these policies, and not all support or opposition to them is based on those particular intentions.
In particular I suspect most of the supporters of universal healthcare think of it as a positive right to life/health, whereas most of it’s opponents think of it as a issue of governmental power.
Similarly, I suspect supporters of drone strikes think of it in terms of justice and/or preventing terrorism, whereas most of it’s opponents think of it as a issue of governmental power.
Thus people who don’t see governmental power as a problem, or are simply not inclined to think about it and its implications are likely to be more favorable to both.