Quite true, but doesn’t that suggest one question even using the word naive(ly)? In what sense is it adding value to the exchange? If the point is why someone is missing/ignoring X and Y then perhaps it’s important. But if the exchange is about why and how X and Y matter using that terms seems like it runs a risk of derailing the constructive input.
Quite true, but doesn’t that suggest one question even using the word naive(ly)? In what sense is it adding value to the exchange? If the point is why someone is missing/ignoring X and Y then perhaps it’s important. But if the exchange is about why and how X and Y matter using that terms seems like it runs a risk of derailing the constructive input.