No problem. I would have retracted because of the significant downside if you happened to be wrong. Though it’s still possible, I’m not really worried about it anymore given Yvain’s comment.
Heh. Wouldn’t know about Argentina, but newspapers in SimNation are all over it.
In all seriousness though, my claim is a) supported by arguments; b) somewhat relevant to the community; c) not an accusation tantamount to calumny (having a sock is neither illegal nor morally outrageous). The cases aren’t even remotely comparable. Also, there are at least a few people who might be interested in knowing this, if true, and few people who would be interested in covering up the whole business. If not true, then at the very most the “two” of them might “find a valuable conversation partner” in “each other”. (Scare-quoted because I highly doubt that is the case.)
Alright, I was looking for a way to report posts or contact moderators and couldn’t find any, thanks for the link.
But why retract?
No problem. I would have retracted because of the significant downside if you happened to be wrong. Though it’s still possible, I’m not really worried about it anymore given Yvain’s comment.
PSA: Dahlen may be wanted in Argentina for absconding with 43 llamas. I have nothing against Dahlen, but you should guard your ungulates!
EDIT Retracted for publizing unconfirmed rumors
PSA: Dahlen may be wanted in Argentina for absconding with 43 llamas. I have nothing against him, but don’t trust him with your ungulates!EDIT:(comment retracted for possibly starting baseless rumors)Heh. Wouldn’t know about Argentina, but newspapers in SimNation are all over it.
In all seriousness though, my claim is a) supported by arguments; b) somewhat relevant to the community; c) not an accusation tantamount to calumny (having a sock is neither illegal nor morally outrageous). The cases aren’t even remotely comparable. Also, there are at least a few people who might be interested in knowing this, if true, and few people who would be interested in covering up the whole business. If not true, then at the very most the “two” of them might “find a valuable conversation partner” in “each other”. (Scare-quoted because I highly doubt that is the case.)