I agree that one shouldn’t have a right to get criticism for every idea. But maybe some ideas are worth criticism? Maybe some attitudes are worth being questioned? Is there a possibility for moderators to handle such situations manually?
I’m brainstorming—maybe propositions that are logically sound (for example proven with LEAN) shouldn’t be as vulnerable to downvotes as unproven?
I agree that one shouldn’t have a right to get criticism for every idea. But maybe some ideas are worth criticism? Maybe some attitudes are worth being questioned? Is there a possibility for moderators to handle such situations manually?
I’m brainstorming—maybe propositions that are logically sound (for example proven with LEAN) shouldn’t be as vulnerable to downvotes as unproven?
If a proposal makes bad assumptions about what’s true and is logically sound it’s still a bad proposal.
Yep, that was brainstorm, feel free to offer better approach