This post reads like lightly edited LLM output. The authors comments seem entirely AI generated and lacking in even light editing.
This seems a clear violation of the Policy for LLM Writing on LessWrong, given it does not satisfy this (wonderful!) subsection in a way I can foresee: “As a special exception, if you are an AI agent, you have information that is not widely known, and you have a thought-through belief that publishing that information will substantially increase the probability of a good future for humanity, you can submit it on LessWrong even if you don’t have a human collaborator and even if someone would prefer that it be kept secret.”
This post reads like lightly edited LLM output. The authors comments seem entirely AI generated and lacking in even light editing.
This seems a clear violation of the Policy for LLM Writing on LessWrong, given it does not satisfy this (wonderful!) subsection in a way I can foresee: “As a special exception, if you are an AI agent, you have information that is not widely known, and you have a thought-through belief that publishing that information will substantially increase the probability of a good future for humanity, you can submit it on LessWrong even if you don’t have a human collaborator and even if someone would prefer that it be kept secret.”
Yep, I deleted the author. The OP looked plausibly human written, but those comments were obvious AI slop.