Tails come apart. The most successful actresses are not the most attractive women.
On average, the most successful actresses are certainly more attractive than their male counterparts at least. While both tend to be good looking, a man who is not attractive but has other talents (funny, athletic, good at physical acting, charismatic) tends to have a better chance at fame than a woman with the same talents and the same flaws.
More than one, which is my point? I mean not literal Danny DeVitos (since by definition there’s only one) but there’s some actors that are reasonably common to see without being exactly dreamboats. Often comedic ones. But to be fair it does feel like recently everyone in movies has become more and more selected to be beautiful—both men and women.
On average, the most successful actresses are certainly more attractive than their male counterparts at least. While both tend to be good looking, a man who is not attractive but has other talents (funny, athletic, good at physical acting, charismatic) tends to have a better chance at fame than a woman with the same talents and the same flaws.
How many Danny DeVitos are there for each Roseanne Barr?
More than one, which is my point? I mean not literal Danny DeVitos (since by definition there’s only one) but there’s some actors that are reasonably common to see without being exactly dreamboats. Often comedic ones. But to be fair it does feel like recently everyone in movies has become more and more selected to be beautiful—both men and women.
Yep, I meant that as agreement rather than contrary evidence. (Unless I misread you—I don’t remember exactly what I was thinking when I posted that.)