I don’t think these covers the calcChain part, which I’m now convinced is less damning than everything else, but it is still additional evidence (either the rows were swapped manually, or Excel just happened to recalculate the out-of-order rows in the most suspicious possible way).
ACX shared these rebuttals that explain why Gino’s defence doesn’t make sense:
https://fashionalexpectations.substack.com/p/ginormous-coincidences https://twitter.com/JohnHBillings/status/1708187948208857363
I don’t think these covers the calcChain part, which I’m now convinced is less damning than everything else, but it is still additional evidence (either the rows were swapped manually, or Excel just happened to recalculate the out-of-order rows in the most suspicious possible way).