If you actually want to protect children rather than do something which looks like protecting them, an Orwellian solution doesn’t look likely to me. There’s a risk that the authorities will end up doing very bad things to children if there’s that much unaccountable power.
I suggest that the most stable solution would be finding a reliable, extremely attractive way of teaching empathy. I don’t know if this would take becoming batman—to the extent that it does, it would be a very different sort of batman than it takes to get a positive singularity, though it might be related by way of accelerating CEV.
The most reliable way of teaching empathy is by installing a chip in everyone’s brains.
You seem to envision nice batmen whose subgoal stomp hasn’t yet reached dangerous levels. I’m concerned about what happens when a human becomes really focused on their goal, so it overrides niceness.
If you actually want to protect children rather than do something which looks like protecting them, an Orwellian solution doesn’t look likely to me. There’s a risk that the authorities will end up doing very bad things to children if there’s that much unaccountable power.
I suggest that the most stable solution would be finding a reliable, extremely attractive way of teaching empathy. I don’t know if this would take becoming batman—to the extent that it does, it would be a very different sort of batman than it takes to get a positive singularity, though it might be related by way of accelerating CEV.
The most reliable way of teaching empathy is by installing a chip in everyone’s brains.
You seem to envision nice batmen whose subgoal stomp hasn’t yet reached dangerous levels. I’m concerned about what happens when a human becomes really focused on their goal, so it overrides niceness.