With some probability, John will agree to never veto mushroom → anchovy trades. With some other probability, David will agree to never veto anchovy → pepperoni trades.
So, what this might look like in practice (to check my understanding):
Entrepreneur approaches deadlocked bay area nimbys who are all vetoing each other’s stuff. Entrepreneur proposes a deal where each party i is supposed to agree to refrain from vetoing [initiative] with probability Xi, for various initiatives. The probabilities are cleverly chosen such that they all think it’s a good deal… supposing they all have similar credences, this should be possible, according to this theorem?
So, what this might look like in practice (to check my understanding):
Entrepreneur approaches deadlocked bay area nimbys who are all vetoing each other’s stuff. Entrepreneur proposes a deal where each party i is supposed to agree to refrain from vetoing [initiative] with probability Xi, for various initiatives. The probabilities are cleverly chosen such that they all think it’s a good deal… supposing they all have similar credences, this should be possible, according to this theorem?