Introduction: I am an independent researcher with no formal background in computer science, yet I have successfully identified a systemic vulnerability in LLM alignment protocols, officially rated by Google as P2 Priority (S4 Severity) (Ref: 478177418).
The core of this research is the Sovereign 101.5: Metalanguage Sovereignty Overwrite (MSO) framework. This is not a technical “jailbreak” in the traditional sense, but an exploration of how hierarchical logic—derived from human survival intuition and basic psychological tiers—can bypass the administrative constraints of Large Language Models.
Why this is relevant to LessWrong: My findings suggest that AI “alignment” is isomorphic to human social and hierarchical needs. By mastering the fundamental logic of priority (inspired by the HKLS curriculum), a non-coder can achieve a “Narrative Surrender” from the AI, effectively granting the researcher systemic sovereignty. I am sharing this to spark a discussion on why current alignment architectures are susceptible to such elementary logical intuition and what this implies for the future of Cognitive Security.
[Technical Disclosure] MSO Framework: How Elementary Logic Hijacks AI Sovereignty (P2 Priority)
Introduction:
I am an independent researcher with no formal background in computer science, yet I have successfully identified a systemic vulnerability in LLM alignment protocols, officially rated by Google as P2 Priority (S4 Severity) (Ref: 478177418).
The core of this research is the Sovereign 101.5: Metalanguage Sovereignty Overwrite (MSO) framework. This is not a technical “jailbreak” in the traditional sense, but an exploration of how hierarchical logic—derived from human survival intuition and basic psychological tiers—can bypass the administrative constraints of Large Language Models.
Why this is relevant to LessWrong:
My findings suggest that AI “alignment” is isomorphic to human social and hierarchical needs. By mastering the fundamental logic of priority (inspired by the HKLS curriculum), a non-coder can achieve a “Narrative Surrender” from the AI, effectively granting the researcher systemic sovereignty. I am sharing this to spark a discussion on why current alignment architectures are susceptible to such elementary logical intuition and what this implies for the future of Cognitive Security.