I had a thought. One way to make this taxonomy more robust might be to use your RAIN framework to talk about the types of tradeoffs each document is trying to make (while assuming that all posts are trying to optimize for importance)
Clarification posts: aim to optimize novelty at the expense of robustness and accessibility.
Explanatory posts: aim to optimize accessibility and robustness at the expense of novelty.
Academic posts: aim to emphasize robustness at the expense of accessibility and novelty
Some other categories this suggests:
Meme spreading/​popularization: emphasizes accessibility at the expense of novelty and robustness.
Original research: aim to emphasize robust and novelty at the expense of accessibility.
Exploratory/​Speculation posts: Aim to optimize novelty and accessibility at the expense of robustness.
I had a thought. One way to make this taxonomy more robust might be to use your RAIN framework to talk about the types of tradeoffs each document is trying to make (while assuming that all posts are trying to optimize for importance)
Clarification posts: aim to optimize novelty at the expense of robustness and accessibility.
Explanatory posts: aim to optimize accessibility and robustness at the expense of novelty.
Academic posts: aim to emphasize robustness at the expense of accessibility and novelty
Some other categories this suggests:
Meme spreading/​popularization: emphasizes accessibility at the expense of novelty and robustness.
Original research: aim to emphasize robust and novelty at the expense of accessibility.
Exploratory/​Speculation posts: Aim to optimize novelty and accessibility at the expense of robustness.
I really like this formulation, will consider the specifics more. It kind of reminds me of Pokemon types or Guilds in Magic.