I downvoted that post myself. (Uh....sorry?) My engagement with it was as follows:
I opened the post. It consisted of a few paragraphs that did not sound particularly encouraging (‘ethicophysical treatment...modeled on the work of Hegel and Marx’ does not fill me with joy to read), plus a link at the top ‘This is a linkpost for [link]’.
I clicked the link. It took me here, to a paywalled Substack post with another link at the top.
I clicked the next link. It took me here, to a sketchy-looking site that wanted me to download a PDF.
I sighed, closed the tab, went back and downvoted the post.
I...guess this might be me being impatient or narrow-minded or some such. But ideally I would like either to see what your post is about directly, or at least have a clearer and more comprehensible summary that makes me think putting the effort into digging in will likely be rewarded.
I don’t think you’re being consistently downvoted: most of your comments are neutral-to-slightly positive?
I do see one recent post of yours that was downvoted noticeably, https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/48X4EFJdCQvHEvL2t/ethicophysics-ii-politics-is-the-mind-savior
I downvoted that post myself. (Uh....sorry?) My engagement with it was as follows:
I opened the post. It consisted of a few paragraphs that did not sound particularly encouraging (‘ethicophysical treatment...modeled on the work of Hegel and Marx’ does not fill me with joy to read), plus a link at the top ‘This is a linkpost for [link]’.
I clicked the link. It took me here, to a paywalled Substack post with another link at the top.
I clicked the next link. It took me here, to a sketchy-looking site that wanted me to download a PDF.
I sighed, closed the tab, went back and downvoted the post.
I...guess this might be me being impatient or narrow-minded or some such. But ideally I would like either to see what your post is about directly, or at least have a clearer and more comprehensible summary that makes me think putting the effort into digging in will likely be rewarded.