They can write their result on two pieces of paper and bring them together. But as long as we treat perspective as fundamental, there still won’t be any non-locality.
Nonocality is more than one thing. The correlation I spoke of continue to exist even if your metaphysics say they can’t.
That’s fair. I think it would be beyond my expertise to criticize other notions of correlational non-locality. I just wanted to point once treating perspectives as fundamental, the non-locality cannot be formulated in QM. Somewhat similar to QBism’s treatment of nonlocality.
Nonocality is more than one thing. The correlation I spoke of continue to exist even if your metaphysics say they can’t.
That’s fair. I think it would be beyond my expertise to criticize other notions of correlational non-locality. I just wanted to point once treating perspectives as fundamental, the non-locality cannot be formulated in QM. Somewhat similar to QBism’s treatment of nonlocality.