Now all you need is a token so anomalous, it works on humans!
I wish I could run Jessica Rumbelow’s and mwatkins’s procedure on my own brain and sensory inputs.
The analogous output would probably optical illusions—adversarial inputs to the eyeballs that mislead your brain into incorrect completions and conclusions. Or in the negative case, something that induces an epileptic seizure.
Yeah, but (almost) all current optical illusions don’t tend to “reach for the centroid,” as it were. What horrors lurk there…?
Introducing ambiguity into people’s mental models is like stealing candies from children.
If such a thing existed, how could we know?
fnord
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fnord)
Now all you need is a token so anomalous, it works on humans!
I wish I could run Jessica Rumbelow’s and mwatkins’s procedure on my own brain and sensory inputs.
The analogous output would probably optical illusions—adversarial inputs to the eyeballs that mislead your brain into incorrect completions and conclusions. Or in the negative case, something that induces an epileptic seizure.
Yeah, but (almost) all current optical illusions don’t tend to “reach for the centroid,” as it were. What horrors lurk there…?
Introducing ambiguity into people’s mental models is like stealing candies from children.
If such a thing existed, how could we know?
fnord
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fnord)