Please, just please, don’t start RSI on purpose. For years, AI x-risk people have warned us that a huge danger comes with AI capable of RSI, and even the mere existence of it poses a threat. We were afraid we would accidentally miss the point of no return, and now, so many people (not even in major AI companies, but in smaller labs too) are trying to bring that point closer purposefully.
Programs sometimes don’t work as we expect them to, even when we are the ones designing them. How would making the hallucination machine do this job produce something so powerful with working guardrails?
I know your comment isn’t an earnest attempt to convince people, but fwiw:
For years, AI x-risk people have warned us that a huge danger comes with AI capable of RSI
I think this argument is more likely to have the opposite effect than intended when used on the types of people pushing on RSI. I think your final paragraph would be much more effective.
Idiot disaster monkeys indeed. I still believe we as a species can make less fatal choices, even though many individual people in the AI industry are working very hard of their own free will to prove me wrong.
Maybe we shouldn’t start RSI on purpose.
Please, just please, don’t start RSI on purpose. For years, AI x-risk people have warned us that a huge danger comes with AI capable of RSI, and even the mere existence of it poses a threat. We were afraid we would accidentally miss the point of no return, and now, so many people (not even in major AI companies, but in smaller labs too) are trying to bring that point closer purposefully.
Programs sometimes don’t work as we expect them to, even when we are the ones designing them. How would making the hallucination machine do this job produce something so powerful with working guardrails?
I know your comment isn’t an earnest attempt to convince people, but fwiw:
I think this argument is more likely to have the opposite effect than intended when used on the types of people pushing on RSI. I think your final paragraph would be much more effective.
Idiot disaster monkeys indeed. I still believe we as a species can make less fatal choices, even though many individual people in the AI industry are working very hard of their own free will to prove me wrong.