Heinrich counters with his own Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis – humans evolved big brains in order to be able to maintain things like Inuit seal hunting techniques.
I can’t really see how this would work.
Partly this is because maintaining techniques like this doesn’t seem difficult enough to justify just how intelligent humans are—on a scale of chimp to human it seems like it’s more on the chimp end. The fact that inventing the technique is impressive doesn’t imply that learning the technique is impressive.
But mainly I can’t see the selection pressure for increasing intelligence. Not being able to remember the hunting technique is obviously bad but where is the upwards selection pressure?
I definitely agree that Cultural Intelligence is important and is one of the ways humans have used their intelligence but I think the Machiavellian Intelligence Hypothesis is a stronger candidate for the root cause.
Upward selection pressure: Assuming that seal hunting comes with a nontrivial chance of failure because it’s so complex, and greater intelligence produced a higher hunting success rate, wouldn’t that be an upward selection pressure?
(of course even a good hunter would find it useful to be funny, charming, or occasionally devious, so this doesn’t mean that Machiavellian Intelligence isn’t also a root cause)
And defining the chimp-to-human scale may be tricky. You don’t need to write poetry to pass along cooking instructions, but some kind of language is helpful to communicate the idea of “let these leaves dry for 2 days before you eat them”. Physiologically speaking, our brains probably haven’t changed much in millennia, and the “end goal” of natural selection probably wasn’t the internet or jet engines, but we have those as nice side effects.
Yes, that’s definitely upward selection pressure but I think that’s more evidence for “ability to solve problems” being the cause of our intelligence rather than “ability to transmit culture”.
Most cultural processes could be transmitted by being shown what to do and punished if you do it wrong. Language makes it easier but isn’t necessarily required. Chimps have some fairly complex tool kits knowledge of which appear to be transmitted culturally.
I can’t really see how this would work.
Partly this is because maintaining techniques like this doesn’t seem difficult enough to justify just how intelligent humans are—on a scale of chimp to human it seems like it’s more on the chimp end. The fact that inventing the technique is impressive doesn’t imply that learning the technique is impressive.
But mainly I can’t see the selection pressure for increasing intelligence. Not being able to remember the hunting technique is obviously bad but where is the upwards selection pressure?
I definitely agree that Cultural Intelligence is important and is one of the ways humans have used their intelligence but I think the Machiavellian Intelligence Hypothesis is a stronger candidate for the root cause.
Upward selection pressure: Assuming that seal hunting comes with a nontrivial chance of failure because it’s so complex, and greater intelligence produced a higher hunting success rate, wouldn’t that be an upward selection pressure?
(of course even a good hunter would find it useful to be funny, charming, or occasionally devious, so this doesn’t mean that Machiavellian Intelligence isn’t also a root cause)
And defining the chimp-to-human scale may be tricky. You don’t need to write poetry to pass along cooking instructions, but some kind of language is helpful to communicate the idea of “let these leaves dry for 2 days before you eat them”. Physiologically speaking, our brains probably haven’t changed much in millennia, and the “end goal” of natural selection probably wasn’t the internet or jet engines, but we have those as nice side effects.
Yes, that’s definitely upward selection pressure but I think that’s more evidence for “ability to solve problems” being the cause of our intelligence rather than “ability to transmit culture”.
Most cultural processes could be transmitted by being shown what to do and punished if you do it wrong. Language makes it easier but isn’t necessarily required. Chimps have some fairly complex tool kits knowledge of which appear to be transmitted culturally.